Legal Comparison and the Harmonisation of Doping Rules

InhaltsangabeInhaltsübersicht: Part I: The Institutional Framework: International Co-Operation - Sports Organisations - Part II: Public Law: A. Autonomy of Associations - A European Legal Comparison of Anti-Doping Rules in Sport: Factual Outlines of European Sport Associations - The Relationship between Sport and Politics - Law Relating to the Freedom of Association. Constitutional Provisions - Individual Guarantees of the Freedom of Association - Recent Governmental Activities in the Fight against Doping - Conclusions - B. A Comperative Legal Analysis of Anti-Doping Activities - General Framework and Criminal Law Aspects: General Topics / Basic Information - Combating Doping by Means of Criminal Law - Anti-Doping Measures outside of Criminal Law - Outlook - Results and Conclusions - Part III: Sport Rules and Regulations: A. Introduction - B. Aspects Researched: Definition of Doping - The Purpose of the Ban on Doping - List of Prohibited Substances and Methods - Doping Control outside of a Competition Context - Fundamental Rights of the Athlete and Procedural Mental Guarantees - System of Sanctions - Adoption and Mutual Recognition of Doping Sanctions - C. Results of a Case Study on Doping in Sport - D. Medical Limits (Cut-Off Limits in Doping Control): Introduction - Medical and Scientific Background - Legal Analysis - Legal Review - Outlook and Alternatives - E. Summary and Conclusions - Part IV: Analysis of Doping Cases of the Court of Arbitration for Sport: Introduction - Aspects of the CAS Jurisprudence Researched - Summary and Conclusions - Part V: General Conclusions and Recommendations: Statutory Law - Sports Law - Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) - Main Recommendations Concerning Harmonisation - Literature and Documents